Finland vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Finland
70.45
in 2014
Kazakhstan
69.33
in 2014
Finland rank
22nd
Kazakhstan rank
24th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 70.45 against 69.33 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.12.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 22nd and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.66 | 66.4 | 11.26 | Finland |
| 2010s | 72.47 | 68.39 | 4.08 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Finland or Kazakhstan?
- Finland, at 70.45 against 69.33 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 1.12, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 22nd and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.