Finland vs Japan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Finland
70.45
in 2014
Japan
73.25
in 2014
Finland rank
22nd
Japan rank
20th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 73.25 against 70.45 in Finland, a difference of 2.8.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 22nd and Japan ranks 20th of 181 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.66 | 69.95 | 7.71 | Finland |
| 2010s | 72.47 | 71.27 | 1.2 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Finland or Japan?
- Japan, at 73.25 against 70.45 in Finland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Finland and Japan?
- 2.8, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Japan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 22nd and Japan ranks 20th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.