Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Eswatini
36.37
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau
36.41
in 2014
Eswatini rank
169th
Guinea-Bissau rank
168th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 36.41 against 36.37 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 169th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 168th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.93 | 35.37 | 0.5602 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 36.19 | 36.41 | 0.2192 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 36.41 against 36.37 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.04, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 169th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 168th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.