Estonia vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Estonia
68.69
in 2014
Malaysia
69.16
in 2014
Estonia rank
28th
Malaysia rank
26th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Estonia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 69.16 against 68.69 in Estonia, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.39 | 67.3 | 4.09 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 68.61 | 70.42 | 1.81 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Estonia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 69.16 against 68.69 in Estonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Estonia and Malaysia?
- 0.47, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Estonia and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Estonia ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.