Eritrea vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Eritrea
64.95
in 2014
Tonga
65.65
in 2014
Eritrea rank
50th
Tonga rank
48th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Eritrea
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 65.65 against 64.95 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 50th and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.28 | 63.46 | 3.81 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 65.45 | 65.65 | 0.2048 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Eritrea or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 65.65 against 64.95 in Eritrea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Eritrea and Tonga?
- 0.7, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tonga?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Eritrea and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Eritrea ranks 50th and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.