Eritrea vs Poland: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Eritrea
64.95
in 2014
Poland
64.83
in 2014
Eritrea rank
50th
Poland rank
51st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Eritrea
- Poland
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 64.95 against 64.83 in Poland, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 50th and Poland ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.28 | 54.71 | 12.57 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 65.45 | 61.66 | 3.78 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Eritrea or Poland?
- Eritrea, at 64.95 against 64.83 in Poland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Eritrea and Poland?
- 0.12, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Poland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Eritrea and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Eritrea ranks 50th and Poland ranks 51st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.