Ecuador vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Ecuador
57.62
in 2014
Zambia
57.53
in 2014
Ecuador rank
86th
Zambia rank
89th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Ecuador
- Zambia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 57.62 against 57.53 in Zambia, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zambia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 89th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.3 | 60.26 | 1.96 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 58.03 | 57.53 | 0.5005 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Ecuador or Zambia?
- Ecuador, at 57.62 against 57.53 in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Ecuador and Zambia?
- 0.09, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Ecuador ranks 86th and Zambia ranks 89th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.