Dominican Republic vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Dominican Republic
58.32
in 2014
Mauritania
58.47
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
78th
Mauritania rank
77th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 58.47 against 58.32 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 78th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 181 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.47 | 57.29 | 3.18 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 59.74 | 58.47 | 1.27 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Dominican Republic or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 58.47 against 58.32 in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Dominican Republic and Mauritania?
- 0.15, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mauritania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 78th and Mauritania ranks 77th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.