Djibouti vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Djibouti
51.79
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
52.18
in 2014
Djibouti rank
117th
United Arab Emirates rank
115th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 52.18 against 51.79 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.39.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 117th and United Arab Emirates ranks 115th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.79 | 51.2 | 0.5837 | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 51.79 | 52.04 | 0.2544 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Djibouti or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 52.18 against 51.79 in Djibouti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Djibouti and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.39, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Djibouti and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 117th and United Arab Emirates ranks 115th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.