Djibouti vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Djibouti
51.79
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
51.51
in 2014
Djibouti rank
117th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
119th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 51.79 against 51.51 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.28.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Djibouti ranks 117th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.79 | 52.5 | 0.7087 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 51.79 | 52.15 | 0.3663 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Djibouti or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Djibouti, at 51.79 against 51.51 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Djibouti and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.28, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Djibouti and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 117th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 119th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.