Djibouti vs Luxembourg: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Djibouti
51.79
in 2014
Luxembourg
85.7
in 2014
Djibouti rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
2nd

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Djibouti
  • Luxembourg
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 85.7 against 51.79 in Djibouti, a difference of 33.91.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.7 times Djibouti's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 1 regions.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 51.79 85.95 34.17 Luxembourg
2010s 51.79 85.7 33.91 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Djibouti or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 85.7 against 51.79 in Djibouti as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Djibouti and Luxembourg?
33.91, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Luxembourg?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Djibouti and Luxembourg rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Djibouti ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.