Djibouti vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Djibouti
51.79
in 2014
Iceland
82.3
in 2014
Djibouti rank
1st
Iceland rank
3rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 82.3 against 51.79 in Djibouti, a difference of 30.51.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.6 times Djibouti's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 3rd of 1 regions.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.79 | 83.3 | 31.51 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 51.79 | 82.3 | 30.51 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Djibouti or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 82.3 against 51.79 in Djibouti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Djibouti and Iceland?
- 30.51, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Iceland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Djibouti and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 3rd of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.