Denmark vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Denmark
66.75
in 2014
United Kingdom
67.41
in 2014
Denmark rank
37th
United Kingdom rank
34th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • United Kingdom
020406080200320082014

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 67.41 against 66.75 in Denmark, a difference of 0.66.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Denmark ranks 37th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 69.62 67.25 2.38 Denmark
2010s 67.81 67.82 0.012 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Denmark or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 67.41 against 66.75 in Denmark as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Denmark and United Kingdom?
0.66, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United Kingdom?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Denmark and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Denmark ranks 37th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.