Czechia vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Czechia
65.87
in 2014
Tonga
65.65
in 2014
Czechia rank
47th
Tonga rank
48th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Czechia
  • Tonga
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 65.87 against 65.65 in Tonga, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 47th and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 64.46 63.15 1.3 Czechia
2010s 65.87 65.65 0.2176 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Czechia or Tonga?
Czechia, at 65.87 against 65.65 in Tonga as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Czechia and Tonga?
0.22, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Tonga?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Czechia and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Czechia ranks 47th and Tonga ranks 48th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.