Czechia vs Eritrea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Czechia
65.87
in 2014
Eritrea
64.95
in 2014
Czechia rank
47th
Eritrea rank
50th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Czechia
- Eritrea
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 65.87 against 64.95 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.92.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eritrea ahead.
Czechia ranks 47th and Eritrea ranks 50th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.66 | 67.28 | 2.61 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 65.87 | 65.45 | 0.4224 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Czechia or Eritrea?
- Czechia, at 65.87 against 64.95 in Eritrea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Czechia and Eritrea?
- 0.92, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Eritrea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Czechia and Eritrea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Czechia ranks 47th and Eritrea ranks 50th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.