Croatia vs Nicaragua: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Croatia
62.15
in 2014
Nicaragua
62.42
in 2014
Croatia rank
65th
Nicaragua rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Croatia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 62.42 against 62.15 in Croatia, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 65th and Nicaragua ranks 63rd of 184 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.67 | 61.65 | 4.02 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 63.98 | 63.51 | 0.475 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Croatia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 62.42 against 62.15 in Croatia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Croatia and Nicaragua?
- 0.27, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Nicaragua?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Croatia and Nicaragua rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Croatia ranks 65th and Nicaragua ranks 63rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.