Cote d'Ivoire vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Cote d'Ivoire
61.88
in 2014
Tunisia
60.96
in 2014
Cote d'Ivoire rank
66th
Tunisia rank
69th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Tunisia
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 61.88 against 60.96 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.92.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tunisia ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 69th of 181 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 54.14 60.96 6.81 Tunisia
2010s 56.91 60.96 4.05 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Tunisia?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 61.88 against 60.96 in Tunisia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Tunisia?
0.92, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Tunisia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 69th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.