Cote d'Ivoire vs Nicaragua: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Cote d'Ivoire
61.88
in 2014
Nicaragua
62.42
in 2014
Cote d'Ivoire rank
66th
Nicaragua rank
63rd

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Nicaragua
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 62.42 against 61.88 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.54.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 66th and Nicaragua ranks 63rd of 181 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 54.14 61.65 7.51 Nicaragua
2010s 56.91 63.51 6.6 Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 62.42 against 61.88 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Nicaragua?
0.54, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Nicaragua?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Nicaragua rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 66th and Nicaragua ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.