Costa Rica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Costa Rica
51.13
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
51.51
in 2014
Costa Rica rank
121st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
118th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 51.51 against 51.13 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.38.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 121st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.59 | 52.5 | 1.91 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 51.13 | 52.15 | 1.02 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 51.51 against 51.13 in Costa Rica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.38, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 121st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 118th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.