Democratic Republic of Congo vs Eswatini: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
33.51
in 2014
Eswatini
36.37
in 2014
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
169th
Eswatini rank
166th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 36.37 against 33.51 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 2.86.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 169th and Eswatini ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.85 | 35.93 | 7.08 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 31.62 | 36.19 | 4.57 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 36.37 against 33.51 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Eswatini?
- 2.86, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Eswatini rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 169th and Eswatini ranks 166th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.