China vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
China
67.02
in 2014
United Kingdom
67.41
in 2014
China rank
36th
United Kingdom rank
34th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 67.41 against 67.02 in China, a difference of 0.39.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was China ahead.
China ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.13 | 67.25 | 2.88 | China |
| 2010s | 68.5 | 67.82 | 0.6779 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, China or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 67.41 against 67.02 in China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between China and United Kingdom?
- 0.39, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and United Kingdom?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do China and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 34th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.