China vs Moldova: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
China
67.02
in 2014
Moldova
66.68
in 2014
China rank
36th
Moldova rank
38th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Moldova
How they compare
China currently reports 67.02 against 66.68 in Moldova, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Moldova ahead.
China ranks 36th and Moldova ranks 38th of 181 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.13 | 77.51 | 7.39 | Moldova |
| 2010s | 68.5 | 71.27 | 2.77 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, China or Moldova?
- China, at 67.02 against 66.68 in Moldova as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between China and Moldova?
- 0.34, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Moldova?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do China and Moldova rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 36th and Moldova ranks 38th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.