China vs Denmark: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
China
67.02
in 2014
Denmark
66.75
in 2014
China rank
36th
Denmark rank
37th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Denmark
How they compare
China currently reports 67.02 against 66.75 in Denmark, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was China ahead.
China ranks 36th and Denmark ranks 37th of 181 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.13 | 69.62 | 0.5043 | China |
| 2010s | 68.5 | 67.81 | 0.6899 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, China or Denmark?
- China, at 67.02 against 66.75 in Denmark as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between China and Denmark?
- 0.27, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Denmark?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do China and Denmark rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 36th and Denmark ranks 37th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.