Canada vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Canada
60.75
in 2014
Tunisia
60.96
in 2014
Canada rank
70th
Tunisia rank
69th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Canada
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 60.96 against 60.75 in Canada, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 69th of 181 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.76 | 60.96 | 2.8 | Canada |
| 2010s | 63.15 | 60.96 | 2.2 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Canada or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 60.96 against 60.75 in Canada as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Canada and Tunisia?
- 0.21, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Canada and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Canada ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 69th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.