Cameroon vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Cameroon
42.11
in 2014
Solomon Islands
43.49
in 2014
Cameroon rank
154th
Solomon Islands rank
151st

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cameroon
  • Solomon Islands
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 43.49 against 42.11 in Cameroon, a difference of 1.38.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 154th and Solomon Islands ranks 151st of 181 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 41.07 43.49 2.42 Solomon Islands
2010s 41.69 43.49 1.79 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Cameroon or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 43.49 against 42.11 in Cameroon as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Cameroon and Solomon Islands?
1.38, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Solomon Islands?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Cameroon and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Cameroon ranks 154th and Solomon Islands ranks 151st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.