Cambodia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Cambodia
32.79
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
32.37
in 2014
Cambodia rank
173rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
174th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 32.79 against 32.37 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.42.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 173rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 183 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.86 | 29.09 | 5.77 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 33.15 | 30.56 | 2.59 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Cambodia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Cambodia, at 32.79 against 32.37 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.42, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 173rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.