Cambodia vs Liberia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Cambodia
32.79
in 2014
Liberia
34.88
in 2014
Cambodia rank
171st
Liberia rank
168th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Liberia
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 34.88 against 32.79 in Cambodia, a difference of 2.09.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 171st and Liberia ranks 168th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Liberia Difference Ahead
2000s 34.77 33.84 0.9308 Cambodia
2010s 33.15 34.47 1.31 Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Cambodia or Liberia?
Liberia, at 34.88 against 32.79 in Cambodia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Cambodia and Liberia?
2.09, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Liberia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Liberia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Cambodia ranks 171st and Liberia ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.