Cape Verde vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Cape Verde
67.61
in 2014
Tajikistan
67.42
in 2014
Cape Verde rank
32nd
Tajikistan rank
33rd

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Tajikistan
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 67.61 against 67.42 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.19.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 32nd and Tajikistan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 66.86 67.42 0.5594 Tajikistan
2010s 67.46 67.42 0.0405 Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Cape Verde or Tajikistan?
Cape Verde, at 67.61 against 67.42 in Tajikistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Cape Verde and Tajikistan?
0.19, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Tajikistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cape Verde and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Cape Verde ranks 32nd and Tajikistan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.