Burkina Faso vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Burkina Faso
43.83
in 2014
Solomon Islands
43.49
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
151st
Solomon Islands rank
154th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 43.83 against 43.49 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.34.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Solomon Islands ranks 154th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.48 | 43.49 | 2 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 43.83 | 43.49 | 0.3436 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Solomon Islands?
- Burkina Faso, at 43.83 against 43.49 in Solomon Islands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 0.34, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Solomon Islands ranks 154th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.