Burkina Faso vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Burkina Faso
43.83
in 2014
Malawi
43.73
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
148th
Malawi rank
149th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Malawi
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 43.83 against 43.73 in Malawi, a difference of 0.1.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Malawi ranks 149th of 181 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 41.48 35.67 5.81 Burkina Faso
2010s 43.83 39.25 4.58 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Malawi?
Burkina Faso, at 43.83 against 43.73 in Malawi as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Malawi?
0.1, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Malawi?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Burkina Faso and Malawi rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Malawi ranks 149th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.