Burkina Faso vs Cyprus: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Burkina Faso
43.83
in 2014
Cyprus
44.2
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
148th
Cyprus rank
145th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Cyprus
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 44.2 against 43.83 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.37.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Cyprus ranks 145th of 181 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Cyprus Difference Ahead
2000s 42.86 54.17 11.31 Cyprus
2010s 43.83 52.17 8.34 Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Cyprus?
Cyprus, at 44.2 against 43.83 in Burkina Faso as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Cyprus?
0.37, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cyprus?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Burkina Faso and Cyprus rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Cyprus ranks 145th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.