Brunei vs Iraq: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Brunei
47.76
in 2014
Iraq
47.32
in 2014
Brunei rank
135th
Iraq rank
136th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Brunei
- Iraq
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 47.76 against 47.32 in Iraq, a difference of 0.44.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Brunei has been ahead every year.
Brunei ranks 135th and Iraq ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.76 | 46.16 | 1.6 | Brunei |
| 2010s | 47.76 | 47.32 | 0.4332 | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Brunei or Iraq?
- Brunei, at 47.76 against 47.32 in Iraq as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Brunei and Iraq?
- 0.44, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Iraq?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Brunei and Iraq rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Brunei ranks 135th and Iraq ranks 136th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.