Brunei vs Guinea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Brunei
47.76
in 2014
Guinea
48.78
in 2014
Brunei rank
135th
Guinea rank
132nd

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Brunei
  • Guinea
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 48.78 against 47.76 in Brunei, a difference of 1.02.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Brunei ranks 135th and Guinea ranks 132nd of 181 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 47.76 49.74 1.98 Guinea
2010s 47.76 49.54 1.79 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Brunei or Guinea?
Guinea, at 48.78 against 47.76 in Brunei as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Brunei and Guinea?
1.02, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Guinea?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Brunei and Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Brunei ranks 135th and Guinea ranks 132nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.