Brazil vs Nepal: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Brazil
50.11
in 2014
Nepal
49.65
in 2014
Brazil rank
124th
Nepal rank
127th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Nepal
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 50.11 against 49.65 in Nepal, a difference of 0.46.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 127th of 181 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.7 | 46.51 | 5.19 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 51.55 | 49.03 | 2.52 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Brazil or Nepal?
- Brazil, at 50.11 against 49.65 in Nepal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Brazil and Nepal?
- 0.46, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Nepal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Nepal rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Brazil ranks 124th and Nepal ranks 127th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.