Brazil vs Costa Rica: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Brazil
50.11
in 2014
Costa Rica
51.13
in 2014
Brazil rank
124th
Costa Rica rank
121st

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • Costa Rica
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 51.13 against 50.11 in Brazil, a difference of 1.02.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 124th and Costa Rica ranks 121st of 181 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Costa Rica Difference Ahead
2000s 51.7 50.55 1.15 Brazil
2010s 51.55 51.13 0.4127 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Brazil or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 51.13 against 50.11 in Brazil as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Brazil and Costa Rica?
1.02, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Costa Rica?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Brazil and Costa Rica rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Brazil ranks 124th and Costa Rica ranks 121st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.