Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Botswana
63.07
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea
63.23
in 2014
Botswana rank
59th
Equatorial Guinea rank
58th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 63.23 against 63.07 in Botswana, a difference of 0.16.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 59th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 58th of 181 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.78 | 63.61 | 9.83 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 62.86 | 63.46 | 0.5995 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Botswana or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 63.23 against 63.07 in Botswana as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.16, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Botswana and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Botswana ranks 59th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 58th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.