Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
56.89
in 2014
Zambia
57.53
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
92nd
Zambia rank
89th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 57.53 against 56.89 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.64.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zambia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 89th of 183 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.58 | 60.26 | 4.68 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 56.89 | 57.53 | 0.6338 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 57.53 against 56.89 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
- 0.64, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 89th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.