Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Taipei: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
56.89
in 2014
Chinese Taipei
57.52
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
92nd
Chinese Taipei rank
90th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 57.52 against 56.89 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.63.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 90th of 183 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.58 | 57.52 | 1.94 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 56.89 | 57.52 | 0.6257 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 57.52 against 56.89 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.63, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese Taipei?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chinese Taipei rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 90th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.