Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
56.89
in 2014
Seychelles
56.92
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
92nd
Seychelles rank
91st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 56.92 against 56.89 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Seychelles ranks 91st of 183 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.44 | 61.62 | 4.18 | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 56.89 | 57.15 | 0.2547 | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 56.92 against 56.89 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Seychelles?
- 0.03, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Seychelles?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Seychelles ranks 91st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.