Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kyrgyzstan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
56.89
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan
56.78
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
92nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
93rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 56.89 against 56.78 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.58 | 64.63 | 9.05 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 56.89 | 58.35 | 1.46 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 56.89 against 56.78 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.11, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 92nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.