Bhutan vs Cote d'Ivoire: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Bhutan
61.42
in 2014
Cote d'Ivoire
61.88
in 2014
Bhutan rank
67th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
66th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bhutan
  • Cote d'Ivoire
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 61.88 against 61.42 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.46.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Bhutan ranks 67th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 66th of 181 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
2000s 54.79 54.14 0.6439 Bhutan
2010s 68.32 56.91 11.41 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 61.88 against 61.42 in Bhutan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Cote d'Ivoire?
0.46, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Cote d'Ivoire?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Bhutan and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Bhutan ranks 67th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 66th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.