Belarus vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Belarus
78.7
in 2014
New Zealand
77.84
in 2014
Belarus rank
7th
New Zealand rank
8th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Belarus
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 78.7 against 77.84 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.86.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 181 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.55 | 79.77 | 1.78 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 79.18 | 78.56 | 0.6161 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Belarus or New Zealand?
- Belarus, at 78.7 against 77.84 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Belarus and New Zealand?
- 0.86, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Belarus ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.