Belarus vs Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Belarus
78.7
in 2014
Hong Kong
78.74
in 2014
Belarus rank
7th
Hong Kong rank
6th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Belarus
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 78.74 against 78.7 in Belarus, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 7th and Hong Kong ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.55 | 81.5 | 0.0508 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 79.18 | 78.55 | 0.6249 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Belarus or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 78.74 against 78.7 in Belarus as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Belarus and Hong Kong?
- 0.04, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Hong Kong?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Belarus and Hong Kong rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Hong Kong ranks 6th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.