Bangladesh vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Bangladesh
20.82
in 2014
Suriname
28.84
in 2014
Bangladesh rank
180th
Suriname rank
178th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Suriname
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 28.84 against 20.82 in Bangladesh, a difference of 8.02.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 180th and Suriname ranks 178th of 181 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 20.82 28.84 8.01 Suriname
2010s 20.82 28.84 8.01 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Bangladesh or Suriname?
Suriname, at 28.84 against 20.82 in Bangladesh as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Bangladesh and Suriname?
8.02, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Suriname?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bangladesh and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Bangladesh ranks 180th and Suriname ranks 178th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.