Bahamas vs Madagascar: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Bahamas
49.46
in 2014
Madagascar
49.21
in 2014
Bahamas rank
130th
Madagascar rank
131st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- Madagascar
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 49.46 against 49.21 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.25.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 130th and Madagascar ranks 131st of 181 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.33 | 45.91 | 6.42 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 50.61 | 46.57 | 4.04 | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Bahamas or Madagascar?
- Bahamas, at 49.46 against 49.21 in Madagascar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Bahamas and Madagascar?
- 0.25, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Madagascar?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Bahamas and Madagascar rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 130th and Madagascar ranks 131st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.