Azerbaijan vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Azerbaijan
69.02
in 2014
Thailand
69.33
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
27th
Thailand rank
25th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Thailand
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 69.33 against 69.02 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.31.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Thailand ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 25th of 181 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 69.53 69.95 0.4273 Thailand
2010s 69.68 70.26 0.5809 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Thailand?
Thailand, at 69.33 against 69.02 in Azerbaijan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Thailand?
0.31, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Thailand?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Azerbaijan and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 25th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.