Azerbaijan vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Azerbaijan
69.02
in 2014
Malaysia
69.16
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
27th
Malaysia rank
26th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 69.16 against 69.02 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.14.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.53 | 67.3 | 2.23 | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 69.68 | 70.42 | 0.7418 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 69.16 against 69.02 in Azerbaijan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Malaysia?
- 0.14, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.