Azerbaijan vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Azerbaijan
69.02
in 2014
Kazakhstan
69.33
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
27th
Kazakhstan rank
24th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Kazakhstan
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 69.33 against 69.02 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.31.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 27th and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 181 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 69.53 66.4 3.13 Azerbaijan
2010s 69.68 68.39 1.29 Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 69.33 against 69.02 in Azerbaijan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan?
0.31, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 27th and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.