Austria vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Austria
80.58
in 2014
Singapore
89.16
in 2014
Austria rank
4th
Singapore rank
1st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Austria
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 89.16 against 80.58 in Austria, a difference of 8.58.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.88 | 92.27 | 11.39 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 80.64 | 89.31 | 8.68 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Austria or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 89.16 against 80.58 in Austria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Austria and Singapore?
- 8.58, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Singapore?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Austria ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.