Austria vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Austria
80.58
in 2014
South Korea
79.17
in 2014
Austria rank
4th
South Korea rank
5th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Austria
- South Korea
How they compare
Austria currently reports 80.58 against 79.17 in South Korea, a difference of 1.41.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 4th and South Korea ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.88 | 78.73 | 2.15 | Austria |
| 2010s | 80.64 | 79.41 | 1.23 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Austria or South Korea?
- Austria, at 80.58 against 79.17 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Austria and South Korea?
- 1.41, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and South Korea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Austria and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Austria ranks 4th and South Korea ranks 5th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.